research
All papers, research, studies and analysis are currently available by request. Those with DOI are published, available for download and peer review. Updated monthly.
To request any of the papers or information on research partnerships, email info@sourcedynamics.org
THE THEORETICAL ARCHITECTURE01 The Revised Source Dynamics Law (Second Edition) The governing equation of power in all organized systems. Three structural layers. Connection, friction, the unified force budget. The formal derivation of AI structural zero.
02 Structural Tension Theory Productive tension as the upstream condition required for genuine generation. The Load Principle. The Tension Removal Thesis. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19080271
03 Human Coherence Theory The complete structural architecture of the individual human field. Three axes. Four planes. Three forces. The center point. Density mechanics. Twelve named failure modes. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19080361
04 Power Field Dynamics The mechanics of how force moves outward, returns, and either builds or depletes the source. Extension, Integration, Offloading. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19080508
05 Containment Dynamics Theory The universal law governing what every organized system is structurally producing. Six developmental levels. Four generative modes. The Masking Loop. The Compensation Dynamic. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19080382
06 Generative Topology Theory The geometric conditions under which genuine origination becomes possible and the architectural boundary between human origination and artificial intelligence, specified at the level of circuit closure. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19080629
07 Organizational Structural Dynamics The application of the law to collective human systems, with a seven-step diagnostic methodology. DOI 10.5281/zenodo.19080453
DERIVIATION STUDIESHuman Coherence Theory: Formal Mathematical Extensions The formal mathematical specification of the human field architecture across differential geometry, information theory, and control theory. Twelve failure mode classes formally derived. The Observer Collapse Sequence as a directional law. The first quantitative threshold for third-field divergence.
Containment Dynamics Theory, Paper 2 (The CDT Diagnostic) Power asymmetry, extraction, and subsidy across organizational, relational, and developmental domains. Retrospective case analysis of Enron, Lehman Brothers, Nokia, and Boeing through the six-level framework. The size-density distinction applied across scales.
The Field Signature Five structural capacities exclusive to living human fields: Taste, Agency, Discernment, Coherence, Sensuality. Each locatable within the vertical architecture, each non-reproducible by artificial intelligence.
Collapse as Redistribution Five organizational case analyses. Netflix as the genuine generation baseline. Enron, Nokia, Kodak, and Boeing as four structurally distinct failure sequences. Lead times from two months to thirteen years. Five cross-case findings.
AI as Structural Exposure Five registered trajectory analyses on AI deployment. Process position as the primary governance variable. The three-crisis cascade specified as a single structural event. Density-dependent differential effects at 18-to-36-month horizons.
The Effort Framework The measurable gap between actual structural expenditure and perceived effort. The Effort Gap as a leading indicator of strain twelve to twenty-four months before conventional measures register it. Three distinct structural causes specified, each with opposite interventions.
Capital Systems and the Source Dynamics Law The two structurally distinct mechanisms producing extreme wealth, closed-loop density and consequence-capture and the diagnostic question that distinguishes them. Third-field architecture. Civilizational-scale Masking Loop. Three registered structural predictions.
The Three-Direction Exchange Architecture Genuine exchange between two systems moves in three simultaneous directions: outbound, inbound through the expressing system's architecture toward its source, and shared outward movement after genuine contact. The paper specifies the structural conditions required for each direction to complete, the collapse mechanics at each layer, the Exchange Agreement as an Integrity-layer event, and the complete three-direction force budget. Eleven falsification conditions.
The Distance Tax The third independent entropy cost in every exchange cycle, the structural cost of the distance between the layer where a system's genuine density lives and the layer where its target consequence lives. The paper derives the structural explanation for systematic under-pricing among high-Integrity practitioners, the compound depletion mechanism underlying burnout in high-depth operators, and the diagnostic distinction from G_internal and G_connection elevation. Nine falsification conditions.
PROVISIONAL PATENT PORTFOLIO01 — Structural Position Diagnostic System The dual-instrument architecture producing the coordinate grid and generative mode classification.
02 — Integrity as Mutual Information The formal specification of structural weight as a measurable information-theoretic quantity.
03 — AI Process Position Classification The system for classifying AI deployment as front-of-process or back-of-process with structural consequence projections.
04 — Effort Gap Measurement The five-variable burnout prediction framework underlying the Effort Framework.
05 — Masking Loop Detection The diagnostic system for identifying the structural suppression of leading indicators.
06 — Structural Distance Formula The gravity mechanism quantifying force degradation across structural distance.
07 — Compatibility Prediction Engine The system for predicting structural compatibility between two systems prior to exchange.
SIGNATURE CONTRIBUTIONS-
The structural mechanism through which a system in borrowed compensation actively suppresses its own leading indicators. Formally modeled as a negative-feedback controller. The reason collapse appears sudden even when the structural condition was readable for years.
-
The structural cost paid on every expression cycle when a system's genuine weight lives at one layer and its target consequence lives at another. The reason operators with the deepest foundations systematically under-price themselves and the framework that makes the cost visible and accountable.
-
Every genuine exchange operates in three simultaneous directions, outbound expression, inbound reception through the expressing system's architecture toward its source, and joint movement outward after genuine contact. Most analysis specifies only the first. The second and third determine whether the exchange compounds or depletes.
-
Every organized system produces across six qualitatively distinct levels simultaneously, from foundational stability to fully realized consequence. At each level, one of four generative modes is operating: genuine generation, borrowed compensation, extraction, or subsidy.
-
The gap between what a system is actually expending, structurally, and what it perceives itself to be spending. A measurable leading indicator of strain twelve to twenty-four months before conventional measures register it.
-
Five structural capacities exclusive to living human fields: Taste, Agency, Discernment, Coherence, Sensuality, each locatable within the architecture, each non-reproducible by artificial intelligence.
-
The specific directional order in which the three structural layers deteriorate under observation withdrawal, and the reverse order in which they repair.
-
C_AI = Cap × 0 = 0. AI's foundation-layer weight is zero by architectural definition. Therefore AI's structural Containment is zero for all values of Capacity.
-
The nine-step invariant sequence through which any system in borrowed compensation deteriorates. Domain-independent. The same sequence operates in individuals, relationships, organizations, and civilizations.
RETROSPECTIVE CASE STUDIES| Organization | Structural Divergence Readable | Conventional Metrics Declined | Lead Time | What Failed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enron | 1997–1998 | 2000–2001 | 2–4 years | Integrity |
| Boeing | 2000–2005 | 2018–2019 | 8–13 years | Integrity |
| Kodak | 1993–1995 | 2000–2003 | 5–7 years | Containment |
| Nokia | 2005–2007 | 2009–2010 | 2–3 years | Capacity |
| Lehman Brothers | 2003 | 2008 | 5 years | Containment |
| Netflix | July 2011 | September 2011 | 2 months | Recovered |
The governing law was applied retrospectively to five major organizational events. In each case, the structural signal of collapse was present from data the organization was already generating, years before conventional metrics moved.
INDEPENDENT CONVERGENCEMIT ︱ Chandra et al., 2026 Findings on AI sycophancy convergent with the Masking Loop mechanism specified in Containment Dynamics Theory.
Google DeepMind ︱ Akbulut et al., 2026 Findings on AI alignment failure modes convergent with the Integrity-Capacity divergence specified by the governing law.
National Bureau of Economic Research ︱ Acemoglu et al., 2026 Labor market findings convergent with the Execution-Origination Bifurcation thesis.
Stony Brook / Carnegie Mellon / Columbia ︱ Liu et al., 2026 Coherence degradation findings under AI mediation convergent with the Field Signature attenuation predictions.
